<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian Issues Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/</link>
	<description>None Sine Causa</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Justus</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Justus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Actually I havn't reserched Badnarik too much.  This election to me is only about national security.  

I was deeply disappointed by the split in the Liberatarian party about the war.  I don't know where Badnarik stands on that issue but, I would be inclined to support Bush in this election regardless of who is running for election because I think he has the right vision, has made the correct, if difficult decisions, and, unlike many, I believe that the war has in fact been handled fairly well and that we are winning it.  Because I think Bush should be rewarded, not punished for this I would be likely to vote for him.

If, the main opposition candidate was running on a platform that expressed complete support for Bush's decision to go to war and was running this election primarily on domestic issues then that candidate might have a chance at winning my vote.  

In general I am sypathetic of the libertarian positions.  However, I do think that we need, as a society, a safety net.  The challenge is in making sure that we have a safety not, not a hammock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I havn&#8217;t reserched Badnarik too much.  This election to me is only about national security.  </p>
<p>I was deeply disappointed by the split in the Liberatarian party about the war.  I don&#8217;t know where Badnarik stands on that issue but, I would be inclined to support Bush in this election regardless of who is running for election because I think he has the right vision, has made the correct, if difficult decisions, and, unlike many, I believe that the war has in fact been handled fairly well and that we are winning it.  Because I think Bush should be rewarded, not punished for this I would be likely to vote for him.</p>
<p>If, the main opposition candidate was running on a platform that expressed complete support for Bush&#8217;s decision to go to war and was running this election primarily on domestic issues then that candidate might have a chance at winning my vote.  </p>
<p>In general I am sypathetic of the libertarian positions.  However, I do think that we need, as a society, a safety net.  The challenge is in making sure that we have a safety not, not a hammock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/2004/10/28/libertarian-issues-guide/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Not sure if you've written about this already, but what do you think of &lt;a HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fstory.news.yahoo.com%2Fnews%3Ftmpl%3Dstory%26ncid%3D1963%26e%3D23%26u%3D%2Fap%2F20041029%2Fap_on_el_pr%2Flibertarian_candidate" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michael Badnarik&lt;/a&gt;? Assuming he had a chance to be elected (rather than simply siphoning votes from Bush or Kerry)would you be inclined to favor him over Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if you&#8217;ve written about this already, but what do you think of <a HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fstory.news.yahoo.com%2Fnews%3Ftmpl%3Dstory%26ncid%3D1963%26e%3D23%26u%3D%2Fap%2F20041029%2Fap_on_el_pr%2Flibertarian_candidate" rel="nofollow">Michael Badnarik</a>? Assuming he had a chance to be elected (rather than simply siphoning votes from Bush or Kerry)would you be inclined to favor him over Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
