Comments on: Scooter indicted

By: Dave Justus

Dave Justus — Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:32:00 +0000

Iraq had plenty of uranium, and was looking for ways to enrich it. The problem with the uranium Iraq had though was that it was known to the U.N. Using it would be dangerous, especially before you had a ready enrichment program and nuclear weapons to deter any response.

We still don’t know for sure if, or how much, Saddam tried to aquire Uranium from Nigeria and/or other African nations. British Intelligence still stands by that claim (last I checked anyway) and while the CIA hasn’t been able to confirm it, they can’t be sure. The famous ‘Nigeria letters’ were of course forgeries, but the mere fact that that was a useful (and successful) scam tells us that the premise was believable.

Obviously people understand Uranium and Nukes go together. Obviously when one is trying to ’sell’ something you use your most successful and easiest to understand arguement. It is a ways from that to deliberately misleading and there is no evidence that we have yet seen that the Bush administration didn’t believe that Iraq was working on covert WMD programs and had WMD stockpiles. Pretty much the entire worlds intelligence services believed that.

Scooter was of course indicted for lying to a grand jury. He was not indicted for lying about WMD, or even outing a covert agent.

By: Ghost Dansing

Ghost Dansing — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:54:00 +0000

The uranium claims had never been significant to career analysts — Iraq had plenty already and lacked the means to enrich it. But the allegations proved irresistible to the White House Iraq Group, which devised the war’s communications strategy and included Libby among its members. Every layman understood the connection between uranium and the bomb, participants in the group said in interviews at the time, and it was the easiest way for the Bush administration to raise alarms.

It was all Republicanesque spin and propaganda. Scooter took the bullet this time, let’s see if he keeps taking them.

By: The probligo

The probligo — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:53:00 +0000

Sorry, Dave. This “misread” featured on the radio stations weekly flubs slot.

It was only Scooter. Not Rove as well.

Yeah, the media down this way do (well some anyway) do have daily in the case of the Herald and weekly in the case of Radio NZ corrections, misprints and general flubbits features. They can range from the quite major (like having GWB’s photo captioned with “Helen Clark”) to a misspelt word that has changed the meaning of a sentence just a little or a misspelt name.

Sorry. I put ya crook.

By: The probligo

The probligo — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:22:00 +0000

News this morning (Saturday, Friday US time) is that Rove is to face indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice.

How close is the heat getting to the kitchen?