Justus For All

None Sine Causa

Hamas Answers?

2:07 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Khalid Mish’al is head of the political bureau of Hamas writes in the Guardian:

Our message to the US and EU governments is this: your attempt to force us to give up our principles or our struggle is in vain. Our people who gave thousands of martyrs, the millions of refugees who have waited for nearly 60 years to return home and our 9,000 political and war prisoners in Israeli jails have not made those sacrifices in order to settle for close to nothing.

Hamas has been elected mainly because of its immovable faith in the inevitability of victory; and Hamas is immune to bribery, intimidation and blackmail. While we are keen on having friendly relations with all nations we shall not seek friendships at the expense of our legitimate rights. We have seen how other nations, including the peoples of Vietnam and South Africa, persisted in their struggle until their quest for freedom and justice was accomplished. We are no different, our cause is no less worthy, our determination is no less profound and our patience is no less abundant.

Our message to the Israelis is this: we do not fight you because you belong to a certain faith or culture. Jews have lived in the Muslim world for 13 centuries in peace and harmony; they are in our religion “the people of the book” who have a covenant from God and His Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) to be respected and protected. Our conflict with you is not religious but political. We have no problem with Jews who have not attacked us – our problem is with those who came to our land, imposed themselves on us by force, destroyed our society and banished our people.

We shall never recognise the right of any power to rob us of our land and deny us our national rights. We shall never recognise the legitimacy of a Zionist state created on our soil in order to atone for somebody else’s sins or solve somebody else’s problem. But if you are willing to accept the principle of a long-term truce, we are prepared to negotiate the terms. Hamas is extending a hand of peace to those who are truly interested in a peace based on justice.

The last paragraph there seems to be a possibility of a willingness to meet my minimum requirements, albiet on their terms. For the most part though, the statement is extremely defiant. At this stage it looks to me like Hamas is planning to give up on western aid, at least for a while. They probably want to see if countries will blink and support them anyway, and they certainly will try to see if they can get enough funding from other sources (possible, Arabs are swimming in oil money from high prices just now.)

My guess is though that they won’t be able to get enough, quick enough, to keep the PA running. If severe cutbacks are required in Palestine due to lack of funds, this could spark a hot civil war, particularly as those cut will be primarily Fatah supporters for the most part.

That is not a situation I particularly want to see.

Hamas must be aware of this danger. Whether they are willing to accept it, which is a distinct possibility, remains to be seen.

Israel should probably step up it’s unilateral withdrawal from the occupied territories though. I don’t think they want to be involved in what is probably coming.

9 Comments »

Comment by Greg

January 31, 2006 @ 3:16 pm

I hope and pray all hell breaks lose in the Palestinian Authority as Hamas and Fatah fighters kill each other off finishing some unfinished business we should have finished long ago!

It would be suicidal for Israel to make further unconditional retreats right now. That would only serve to bolster Hamas support in the P.A. and the Arab world.

Comment by Dave Justus

January 31, 2006 @ 3:38 pm

As long as Israel is the occupying power power it is her responsibility, both morally and legally, to protect the populace from violence.

I would also posit that a nicer, more tolerant leadership who is willing to accept peace with Israel is unlikely to emerge from a Hamas vs. Fatah confrontation. Quite the opposite in fact.

Comment by Tovya

January 31, 2006 @ 6:33 pm

We occupy nothing. Israel was ours 2000 years before Islam was even a concept in the unborn Mohammed’s mind.

Comment by probligo

January 31, 2006 @ 6:59 pm

Tovya, I just wish that there was a way that I could fulfil your wish for you -

- and send you back those 4000 years, or 3000 years.

Then perhaps you might understand…

________________________________

Greg, be sure that you might live to regret your wish.

Comment by Tovya

January 31, 2006 @ 7:14 pm

Understand what? That I might meet David HaMelech? I could wish for as much.

Comment by probligo

January 31, 2006 @ 7:26 pm

Tovya,

I was thinking more in understanding the nature of a short and brutal life, sweetie.

Things were not a lot different back then as I understand your history. The only change to the present day perhaps has been the ability to kill more people at a greater distance.

Comment by Dave Justus

January 31, 2006 @ 8:45 pm

I believe that the claim of the Jewish people to Israel, if we want to dig into ancient history, is based upon the will of God and the fact that they conquered the territory with a bloody campaign. Extremely bloody if I recall my Bible.

The Arabs claim is identical, except I believe their conquest was a bit less bloody.

Probligo, perhaps the ability to kill is greater now. The actual killing was a lot greater then.

Anyone who supports the early Hebrew tribes solution to controling the land of Israel is my foe. I will do anything I can to prevent such an outcome. Perhaps God approved of it, I can’t say, but I certainly do not approve of slaughtering entire cities for plunder and to take their land.

Comment by Greg

February 1, 2006 @ 1:30 am

Dave: What happens in P.A. controlled territory hasn’t been Israel’s responsibility since Oslo. Once again I can only hope and pray our neighbors to the East engage in a civil war that completely drains their ability to strike at us.

Probligo: I hope I don’t:) and I appreciate your civil position if not towards Israel, at least with regards to my opinions. As the old American maxim goes, we can agree to disagree and that, I believe, what democracy is all about.

Comment by Tovya

February 1, 2006 @ 3:21 pm

Gotcha, well your point is taken.

My point had nothing to do with violence, but rather the historical time frame to ours and their claim. Our claim transends theirs by a few millenia.

I don’t even mind Arabs so long as they leave us alone. All in all, I respect them dearly, but I just don’t respect their will to murder all of us (as Hamas charter brags will be our fate).

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>