<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still a planet to me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejustus.com/2006/08/24/still-a-planet-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2006/08/24/still-a-planet-to-me/</link>
	<description>None Sine Causa</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2006/08/24/still-a-planet-to-me/#comment-3949</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/2006/08/24/still-a-planet-to-me/#comment-3949</guid>
		<description>Honestly, it never made much sense to me that Pluto &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a planet.  It doesn't orbit on the same plane as the other planets, it doesn't have the same shape orbit as they do, and it's "moon" or "co-planet" or whatever, is barely much smaller than it is.  It's clearly space junk that got kicked out of whatever orbit it was in.

I think the requirement that a planet clear it's orbit makes a lot of sense.  Clearly, when Pluto and Neptune meet, Neptune is going to win.

Really, though, the concept of "planet" is arbitrary and subjective, no matter how you peel it.  I think it should be "Any body that formed as a primary gravity-spherical body out of the original accretion disk of a star."  Anything else needs a qualifier, like "Captured planet" or "Sub-stellar body".  But really, "planet" by itself doesn't &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt; anything of value, so how it's defined really isn't important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, it never made much sense to me that Pluto <i>was</i> a planet.  It doesn&#8217;t orbit on the same plane as the other planets, it doesn&#8217;t have the same shape orbit as they do, and it&#8217;s &#8220;moon&#8221; or &#8220;co-planet&#8221; or whatever, is barely much smaller than it is.  It&#8217;s clearly space junk that got kicked out of whatever orbit it was in.</p>
<p>I think the requirement that a planet clear it&#8217;s orbit makes a lot of sense.  Clearly, when Pluto and Neptune meet, Neptune is going to win.</p>
<p>Really, though, the concept of &#8220;planet&#8221; is arbitrary and subjective, no matter how you peel it.  I think it should be &#8220;Any body that formed as a primary gravity-spherical body out of the original accretion disk of a star.&#8221;  Anything else needs a qualifier, like &#8220;Captured planet&#8221; or &#8220;Sub-stellar body&#8221;.  But really, &#8220;planet&#8221; by itself doesn&#8217;t <i>mean</i> anything of value, so how it&#8217;s defined really isn&#8217;t important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
