Justus For All

None Sine Causa

Hamas changing?

12:31 pm on Thursday, October 19, 2006

Reuters

Hamas, the Islamist group that runs the Palestinian government, said on Thursday it could never have imagined the vast international pressure it would come under after winning democratic elections earlier this year.In a candid article published in the Palestinian press, Ahmed Youssef, a political adviser to Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas leader, said the group had been shocked by the strength of opposition to its electoral victory.

“It went beyond all imagination,” wrote Youssef.

“The government … did not expect the pressures and the siege imposed on our people would be so harsh, so strong and so large in scale.”

Youssef’s is the latest in a series of articles by Hamas officials in recent weeks either seeking to explain themselves or calling on the Palestinian community to refrain from violence and think more carefully about how it opposes Israel.

That last line is especially encouraging.  A Hamas that renounced violence and agreed to peaceful means to settle its disputes with Israel could indeed help bring a lot of change to a region that sorely needs it.

4 Comments »

Comment by Ed

October 19, 2006 @ 12:57 pm

A Hamas which renounces violence would not be Hamas. It’s only reason for existing is to violently destroy Israel and supplant it with an Islamist, fundamentalist, theocratic dictatorship.

Hamas will either continue in accordance with its charter and violent raison d’etre, or it will be militarily defeated. No other options are possible.

Comment by Dave Justus

October 19, 2006 @ 1:40 pm

Sort of like an IRA that renounced violence would cease to be an IRA?

Other options are of course always possible. Hamas might not choose to take other options, but the people that make up Hamas certainly can make other choices. I am also far from sure that they are as simplistic in their worldview as you would like them to be.

Comment by Ed

October 19, 2006 @ 5:58 pm

Hamas and the IRA are two different entities. The IRA was created to violently oppose another country.

Hamas was created to violently destroy one.

The IRA never had as a goal establishing itself as a replacement government for England. Hamas was created to replace the Israeli government with a new entity based on Shar’ia law.

That is indeed their simplistic worldview. Can you point to a single act of theirs that contradicts this?

Comment by probligo

October 20, 2006 @ 8:11 am

Ed, can’t agree.

The IRA had the intention of replacing the British administration of Northern Ireland, (elected by a Protestant majority), with an Irish administration dominated by a Catholic minority.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>