Justus For All

None Sine Causa

Jonah Goldberg on Gore

11:59 am on Thursday, March 29, 2007

Examiner.com

Gore says global warming is “a crisis that threatens the survival of our civilization and the habitability of the Earth.” It’s graver than any war. He compares it to the asteroid that allegedly killed the dinosaurs.But here’s the thing. If there were an asteroid barreling toward Earth, we wouldn’t be talking about changing our lifestyles, nor would we be preaching about reducing, reusing and recycling. We would be building giant wicked-cool lasers and bomb-carrying spaceships to go out and destroy the thing.

But Gore doesn’t want to explore geo-engineering (whereby, for example, we’d add sulfate aerosols or other substances to the atmosphere to mitigate global warming). Why? Because solving the problem isn’t really the point.

As Gore makes it clear in his book, “Earth in the Balance,” he wants to change attitudes more than he wants to solve problems. Indeed, he wants to change attitudes about government as much as he wants to preach environmentalism.

He wants to change attitudes more than he wants to solve problems.

That, in a nutshell, is the core of my disagreement with the environmental movement.  It is a church of Gaia and, like most churches, in the end it is more about political control then any professed  laudable  motives.

4 Comments »

Comment by probligo

March 29, 2007 @ 4:37 pm

Only one word to change in there Dave and it would be perfect…

“…and, like all churches…”

Comment by Patrick Lightbody

March 30, 2007 @ 11:15 am

I don’t know if that is totally accurate, or at least somewhat simplifying the overall situation.

The truth is that there is no point to suggest any huge project (geo-whatever, giant sun shades, etc) to solve the problem right now. That’s because politically there is no will to spend the money on that. So in that sense, Gore is doing exactly what needs to be done: address the politics, then the solutions (and checks to pay for them) will come.

Honestly: do you think if Gore *did* suggest geo-engineering that Conservatives would suddenly embrace him? What would you like to see him do differently? And how would those different actions have a better chance at “solving the problem”?

Comment by Patrick Lightbody

March 30, 2007 @ 11:20 am

I should add – I don’t disagree that the general movement is guilty of engaging in this behavior from time to time, but I’m not certain if one can fault Gore for focussing on the politics. He is, afterall, a politician.

But why most of the hippies shun nuclear still frustrates me. It’s one of our best options right now!

Comment by Dave Justus

March 30, 2007 @ 11:35 am

First off, Gore is not simply a politician on this issue. He has presented himself as an expert, both via his documentary and his testimony to congress. He is also the ‘official spokesman,’ as much as their is of one, for this whole thing.

Secondly, the focus of this criticism is not that Gore is trying to solve environmental problems through political means, but he is trying to leverage environmental concerns (the latest and greatest being global warming) to accomplish seperate and not necessarily related political goals, in this case centralization of power, command and control economy, and a general status of citizens as being tools toward social ends, rather then individuals being ends unto themselves, and persueing happiness as they see fit.

The fear of global warming is being used, and exaggerated to promote this cause.

Of course geo-engineering doesn’t require the massive projects that you suggest. There are several viable ways of doing this that would cost a fraction of what Kyoto would cost. The political will could, I think, be created to at least fully explore them, but that wouldn’t accomplish the actual goals of the movement.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>