<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biofuels Will Aid Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejustus.com/2008/02/08/biofuels-will-aid-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/02/08/biofuels-will-aid-warming/</link>
	<description>None Sine Causa</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: probligo</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/02/08/biofuels-will-aid-warming/#comment-444078</link>
		<dc:creator>probligo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/2008/02/08/biofuels-will-aid-warming/#comment-444078</guid>
		<description>I find this difficult to follow.

To my knowledge,  none of the proposed "green" fuels (ethanol,  methanol) reduce or remove the emmission of CO2 as a by-product of their use.  They &lt;b&gt;might&lt;/b&gt; have a higher "unit energy per carbon unit" output.  From the figures I have seen that return might be marginal at best - 5% or so.

How does "bio-mass fuel" (and yes I know what it is) make any great difference - other than by reducing the use of &lt;b&gt;mineral&lt;/b&gt; oil?

That difference is not,  I suggest,  making any great difference to carbon emission.

It does make a &lt;b&gt;strategic&lt;/b&gt; difference to fuel availability but that does nothing for climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this difficult to follow.</p>
<p>To my knowledge,  none of the proposed &#8220;green&#8221; fuels (ethanol,  methanol) reduce or remove the emmission of CO2 as a by-product of their use.  They <b>might</b> have a higher &#8220;unit energy per carbon unit&#8221; output.  From the figures I have seen that return might be marginal at best - 5% or so.</p>
<p>How does &#8220;bio-mass fuel&#8221; (and yes I know what it is) make any great difference - other than by reducing the use of <b>mineral</b> oil?</p>
<p>That difference is not,  I suggest,  making any great difference to carbon emission.</p>
<p>It does make a <b>strategic</b> difference to fuel availability but that does nothing for climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
