<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Growth vs Stability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/</link>
	<description>None Sine Causa</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Goods</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/#comment-910850</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Goods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/?p=3187#comment-910850</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by HikaYagami on 2008-11-08  Economic Growth vs Stability  http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/ - bookmarked by 2 members [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by HikaYagami on 2008-11-08  Economic Growth vs Stability  <a href="http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/" rel="nofollow">http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/</a> - bookmarked by 2 members [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Justus</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/#comment-702613</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Justus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/?p=3187#comment-702613</guid>
		<description>Well, I'd be surprised if things are as dire as that, and if they are, I don't see China coming out of it a winner.

China has expirienced a lot of growth, but it is still trying to build up a descent economic base through funding via cheap exports.  A general economic collapse ends that suddenly, leaving China with all of its other problems and no growth from its exports.  Given that with China's demographics it doesn't have a whole lot of time to get rich before it is old, that would be disasterous.  Even with a strong world economy, China's challenges are immense, with a weak world economy it is really screwed.  

Fannie and Freddie won't fail.  There will be some losses and possibly some fairly serious restructuring.  People have pointed out for years that the strange mix of public and private backing that makes up these entities is untenable, and we are seeing that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;d be surprised if things are as dire as that, and if they are, I don&#8217;t see China coming out of it a winner.</p>
<p>China has expirienced a lot of growth, but it is still trying to build up a descent economic base through funding via cheap exports.  A general economic collapse ends that suddenly, leaving China with all of its other problems and no growth from its exports.  Given that with China&#8217;s demographics it doesn&#8217;t have a whole lot of time to get rich before it is old, that would be disasterous.  Even with a strong world economy, China&#8217;s challenges are immense, with a weak world economy it is really screwed.  </p>
<p>Fannie and Freddie won&#8217;t fail.  There will be some losses and possibly some fairly serious restructuring.  People have pointed out for years that the strange mix of public and private backing that makes up these entities is untenable, and we are seeing that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: probligo</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/07/16/economic-growth-vs-stability/#comment-702220</link>
		<dc:creator>probligo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/?p=3187#comment-702220</guid>
		<description>the probligo's predictions -

Freddie,  Fannie are beyond government support in any logical or supportable form.  There are at least two (Citibank,  Fargo(?)) major banks skating the thin ice.

The sub-prime investment "crisis" will,  over the next five years,  lead to the biggest international financial meltdown since 1929.

As an example of how intense the fear in the international markets has gotten,  think why Rabobank is trying to sell "investments" from Europe in NZ.

There will be one "winner";  and it is not the USofA.

China is all lined up as the next,  unmatched,  global economic power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the probligo&#8217;s predictions -</p>
<p>Freddie,  Fannie are beyond government support in any logical or supportable form.  There are at least two (Citibank,  Fargo(?)) major banks skating the thin ice.</p>
<p>The sub-prime investment &#8220;crisis&#8221; will,  over the next five years,  lead to the biggest international financial meltdown since 1929.</p>
<p>As an example of how intense the fear in the international markets has gotten,  think why Rabobank is trying to sell &#8220;investments&#8221; from Europe in NZ.</p>
<p>There will be one &#8220;winner&#8221;;  and it is not the USofA.</p>
<p>China is all lined up as the next,  unmatched,  global economic power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
