<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russia&#8217;s Invasion of Georgia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejustus.com/2008/08/11/russias-invasion-of-georgia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/08/11/russias-invasion-of-georgia/</link>
	<description>None Sine Causa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:15:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: probligo</title>
		<link>http://www.davejustus.com/2008/08/11/russias-invasion-of-georgia/comment-page-1/#comment-747943</link>
		<dc:creator>probligo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejustus.com/?p=3193#comment-747943</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;I think that the historical analogies are pretty appropriate here. This is an act of aggression from a major power that will probably have a huge effect on the world in years to come.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Prophetic words indeed,  especially since they should have been written seven years back...

I have pondered long and hard about whether to write about Russia/Georgia.  There are many others - obviously including yourself - who are getting stuck into it.  I have that niggling feeling that there is something being missed behind all of this.

Something like -

...is there a parallel between this and Iraq - Kuwait.  Remember that Georgia broke an agreement to not move forces into Ossetia...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/aug2008/gb20080811_303899.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+index+page_top+stories&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The Georgian attack on the South Ossetia capital of Tskhinvali on August 8 turned this &quot;frozen conflict,&quot; as diplomats call it, into a hot proxy war.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

Like that Spiegel article says,  the conflict &quot;suits&quot; both parties.  It gives the Georgians the justification they need to join NATO;  it gives Russia the justification for invading to act as &quot;liberator and peacekeeper&quot; and prevent Georgia from joining Europe.

Then you get into the &quot;control the oil&quot; debate;  or the &quot;typical commie&quot; line (that you seem to support) without ever seeing the parallels.  

As I said,  prophetic words that could equally have applied seven years back...

But that is about my limit - so back to you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>I think that the historical analogies are pretty appropriate here. This is an act of aggression from a major power that will probably have a huge effect on the world in years to come.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Prophetic words indeed,  especially since they should have been written seven years back&#8230;</p>
<p>I have pondered long and hard about whether to write about Russia/Georgia.  There are many others &#8211; obviously including yourself &#8211; who are getting stuck into it.  I have that niggling feeling that there is something being missed behind all of this.</p>
<p>Something like -</p>
<p>&#8230;is there a parallel between this and Iraq &#8211; Kuwait.  Remember that Georgia broke an agreement to not move forces into Ossetia&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/aug2008/gb20080811_303899.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+index+page_top+stories" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The Georgian attack on the South Ossetia capital of Tskhinvali on August 8 turned this &#8220;frozen conflict,&#8221; as diplomats call it, into a hot proxy war.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Like that Spiegel article says,  the conflict &#8220;suits&#8221; both parties.  It gives the Georgians the justification they need to join NATO;  it gives Russia the justification for invading to act as &#8220;liberator and peacekeeper&#8221; and prevent Georgia from joining Europe.</p>
<p>Then you get into the &#8220;control the oil&#8221; debate;  or the &#8220;typical commie&#8221; line (that you seem to support) without ever seeing the parallels.  </p>
<p>As I said,  prophetic words that could equally have applied seven years back&#8230;</p>
<p>But that is about my limit &#8211; so back to you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
